Posted by Colin Rose on October 14, 2008
All you say is true. Trying to burn all the poppy fields on the planet won`t work. And if it`s not heroin or cocaine it will be some other addiction from which criminals and terrorists can make a profit. The root cause is addiction. Addictions kill in one way or another. Whether it addiction is legal or illegal is irrelevant. Legal addctions to tobacco, alcohol and junk food kill thousands of times more people than all illegal addictions combined. But every time a heroin addict spends money on a fix a fraction of that payment goes towards potentially killing a Canadian soldier in Afghanistan. Those who think that heroin addiction is just a disease that has to be treated by “harm reduction” to the individual instead of curing the addiction are only encouraging more payments to terrorists. There is no vaccine against addiction. Curing addiction requires denial of transient self-destructive pleasure and painful decisions by the individual, not something polititians or UNODOC want to talk about. We should be spending at least as much researching, preventing and curing addiction of all types as we spend on the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism.
War on Drugs is killing our soldiers
12 Oct 2008
fghanistan is going badly. ?We?re not going to win this war,? said a top British general this month. Well, pass the smelling salts. The War on Drugs created Afghanistan?s massive illicit drug trade. This trade funds the insurgency, corrupts the…read more…
Posted in addiction, drugs, Uncategorized | Tagged: addiction, Afghanistan, heroin, mortality, poppy, Taliban | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Colin Rose on July 5, 2008
If you go to www.makingtheconnection.ca you find that it is a Pfizer funded site. Pfizer spent many $millions on these terrorist ads. Pfizer makes Lipitor, a statin cholesterol-lowering drug and the biggest selling drug in the world. In 2005 about $US 12 billion was sold.
These advertisements appeared in many Canadian publications over the last few years. The implication is clear: either measure your cholesterol (and take a pill to lower it if you have “dyslipidemia” ) or you will die. This is a propaganda technique known as “the big lie“. Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, “…the magnitude of a lie always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people in the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than consciously and purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds they more easily fall a victim to a big lie than to a little one…” Pfizer has learned well. There is NO evidence that in an otherwise healthy person measuring blood cholesterol and taking a statin to lower blood cholesterol will live any longer than not doing so. Even the Canadian Government in allowing the publication of these ads swallowed the big lie.
All primary prevention trials to date of cholesterol lowering with drugs (LRC-CPPT, WOSCOPS, ASCOT-LLA) have shown NO total mortality benefit.
Posted in atherosclerosis, cholesterol, coronary artery disease, drugs, statins | Tagged: atorvastatin, big lie, Canadian Lipid Nurse Network, cardiovascular disease, cholesterol, death, heart attack, lifestyle diseases, Lipitor, makingtheconnection, medical terrorism, mortality, Pfizer | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Colin Rose on March 26, 2007
For 30 years since the development of a balloon-tipped catheter to dilate coronary arteries, now known as PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention), it has been revealed truth from “experts”, most of whom paid their mortgages by doing PCI’s, that all significant coronary narrowings should be dilated to prevent a heart attack. In spite of overwhelming evidence that heart attacks are caused by rupture or early, unstable, non-obstructive plaques, most cardiologists still believe that heart attacks (sudden complete blockage of a coronary artery) occur at the site of the largest plaques. Patients are shown angiograms and told they have a “widow maker” or are “sitting on a time bomb”. I refused to do angioplasties until there was some proof for this superficial but very lucrative theory. Again, it turns out I was right. Even in patients with major narrowings and symptoms, PCI does not prolong life or prevent heart attacks. Chronic symptoms were slightly more improved in the PCI group but most medically-treated patients had symptom improvement just with pills.
The COURAGE type subject
All cardiologists give lip service to the necessity for lifestyle change as the ultimate cure for atherosclerosis, but in this study there was no attempt at lifestyle change. Most patients were overweight or obese, gained weight over the five year study. 20% smoked and did not stop. While the authors claim to using “optimal” medical therapy, they did not even try significantly changing lifestyle, the obvious cause of the patients’ atherosclerosis. No doubt even better results that could have been obtained with just lifestyle change, without pills or PCI, as Dean Ornish showed many years ago.
If you want an explanation for why, except for a feeble attempt to raise HDL by exercise, NO attempt was made to change lifestyle meaningfully before using statins or PCI you need look no further than the source of funding and the disclosure statements of the authors. Those who recieve substantial income from drug dealers are not keen on proving that cost-free lifestyle change alone will do the same or better than expensive drugs.
Now, why has it taken 30 years to finally prove the futility of PCI in patients with stable or stabilized coronary disease? Unlike new drugs, there are no rules and no government agency mandating that surgical procedures have to undergo clinical trials before being done on the general population. Any surgeon can develop some operation that seems superfically rational and he and his colleagues can do many thousands of those operations, costing millions or billions of dollars and risking many lives until someone gets around to actually testing it to see if the outcome is really as advertised.
Doctors profess to want to practice “evidence-based medicine” but when change negatively affects bank accounts habits change very slowly if at all. Angioplasty in stable CAD can always be rationalized by the classic, “my patient is different than those in the controlled trial”. We can predict that angioplasties in patients with stable CAD will not decline significantly until most of those trained in the procedure have retired. The system could save a lot of money by giving each of them $one million and a house in Mexico to retire to.
Posted in angioplasty, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, diet, drugs, professionalism, statins | Tagged: Abbot Laboratories, Amgen, angina, angiogram, angioplasty, AstraZeneca, atherosclerosis, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CAD, cardiology, cigarette, coronary artery, COURAGE, diet, GlaxoSmithKline, heart attack, King Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck, mortality, obesity, PCI, Pfizer, plaque, sanofi-aventis, tobacco | 1 Comment »