Panaceia or Hygeia

immunize yourself against the pandemic of lifestyle diseases

Posts Tagged ‘lifestyle’

Health Centre Food – Not Healthy

Posted by Colin Rose on July 30, 2008

Drs Freedhoff and Stevenson are trying to do what we tried to do more than 20 years ago, change the food policies of hospitals. We have encountered all the same excuses listed below. What has taken us many years to accept and what these doctors fail to realize is that hospitals have no interest in promoting or maintaining health; they exist exclusively to treat disease. If the population were as healthy as they could be by continual vigilance in lifestyle choices there would be very little need for hospitals. Health is not profitable and will not support massive “health care” bureaucracies and unions. From the point of view of the “health care” bureaucracy and “health care” unions the ideal situation is to have a chronically sick but breathing population in constant need of “health care”, profitably supplied by said bureaucracies and unions.

Most hospital have now changed there names to some variation on “health center” and medical systems now call themselves “health care” providers, implying that only these institutions can guarantee health. Whenever I hear this I think or Orwell’s 1984. “War is Peace”; “Disease is Health”. Newspeak can exist in democracies in which self-perpetuating bureaucracies must ensure their survival by thought control and fear of death.

———————————————————

CMAJ • July 29, 2008; 179

Frying up hospital cafeteria food

Yoni Freedhoff, MD, Medical Director, Bariatric Medical Institute, Ottawa, Ont.

Rob Stevenson, MD, Cardiologist, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB

Would you like fries with that angioplasty?” Sadly, this is not as far fetched as you might imagine. Although hospitals are the front line for delivering medical treatment, health promotion and education, paradoxically, the foods they sell are frequently generic versions of fast food staples or, worse yet, brand-name fast food. Remarkably, despite nutrition’s indisputable role as one of our most important determinants of health,1 grassroots calls for hospital cafeteria reform often face resistance from hospital administrators and even some allied health professionals.

In dialogue with hospital administrators, we have met 3 main arguments against hospital cafeteria reform. First, they say they are not the “food police.” The hospital’s role need not be one of policing but rather one of health care leadership. Simply put, the sale of unhealthy foods along with the absence of nutritious alternatives undermine the institution’s role in health promotion. Although we do not propose that hospitals be held accountable for dietary choices, we do feel hospitals have a strong societal obligation to lead by example.

Second, public and institutional sentiment holds that adults are responsible for their own food choices. Consequently some people wonder whether hospitals should be restricted to selling exclusively healthy food. Although this argument has merit,what is not debatable is a hospital’s duty to empower consumers with the information required to make informed choices. Unfortunately, restaurant food choice is anything but informed. Consumers underestimate by 2 to 4 times the saturated fat, calories and sodium content of typical restaurant foods.2 However, providing accurate point-of-sale nutritional information significantly improves consumers’ choices.2 As it stands, with limited or no in-hospital nutritional information available, and frequently no nutritious alternatives offered, hospitals do not enable informed choice.

Finally, there is the question of money. Although Canadian hospitals have fewer fast-food outlets than US centres,3 the transition of their cafeterias from services to institutional profit centres is evident. We have even heard it forewarned that hospital programs could be jeopardized if healthier foods fail to sell. This alarmist warning ignores 2 of a hospital’s most important roles: the mission to promote health and the moral obligation to lead by example. Notably, in its 2007 annual report, the Compass Group, one of the world’s market leaders in retail food service delivery, including hospitals, attributed part of its rising profits to its new focus on healthy eating programs.4

Although there are no established criteria for healthy hospital cafeterias, there are healthy initiatives. California’s Sutter General Hospital enables informed choice by posting the nutritional information for a week’s worth of entrees at the cafeteria entrance. Others serve healthy choices with predominantly vegetarian menus, and there are “farm produce to hospital” programs in Texas, Vermont, North Carolina and Iowa.5 The purpose of the recently launched Canadian Healthy Hospital Cafeteria Project Survey, which one of us (R.S.) helped develop, is to identify Canadian examples of such initiatives.6

Addressing this problem will require a shift in values and thinking similar to when hospitals stopped selling cigarettes and later banned smoking on hospital grounds. Today the majority of our adult population is overweight or obese. In this fight, our dietary environment is the new battleground. Junk food is the new tobacco. Now more than ever, it is our ethical and medical responsibility to ensure that hospitals take the lead in serving foods that reflect evidence-based nutrition.

Thus, we call upon all hospitals as community health care leaders to immediately enable healthy and informed choices in their cafeterias. This would include ensuring the availability of flavourful entrees free of trans fats and low in calories, sodium and saturated fat, as well as posting nutritional information on menu boards and at point-of-sale for all foods. These first steps in cafeteria reform will help hospitals renew their focus on health and put an end to deep-fried hypocrisy.

  1. Kant AK, Graubard BI, Schatzkin A. Dietary patterns predict mortality in a national cohort: The national health interview surveys, 1987 and 1992. J Nutr 2004;134:1793-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Burton S, Creyer EH, Kees J, et al. Attacking the obesity epidemic: the potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1669-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. McDonald CM, Karamlou T, Wengle JG, et al. Nutrition and exercise environment available to outpatients, visitors and staff in children’s hospitals in Canada and the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:900-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Compass Group. Delivering profitable growth: annual report 2007. Surrey (UK): The Group; 2007. Available: www.compass-group.com/NR/rdonlyres/00F11551-A102-4E1C-AADD-D0DCFD95C723/0/Compass_Report_2007.pdf (accessed 2008 June 23).
  5. Gottlieb R, Shaffer A. Soda bans, farm-to-school, and fast food in hospitals: an agenda for action. Presentation at the American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; 2002 Nov 13. Available: http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/publications/APHA_Talk.htm (accessed 2008 June 23).
  6. Canadian Healthy Hospital Cafeteria Project Survey. [To complete the survey go to www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=CMsk1a3OrVFrbBABU6udgQ_3d_3d (accessed 2008 June 23)].

George Orwell predicted this. "Hospital" is antithetical to the "Health". "Health Centre" implies a protective, nurturing bureaucracy. No one will get sick there.

 

IMG_0194

Vending machines in the McGill University Health (sic) Center

MUHC

Partners in Disease Care. Healthy lifestyles are also not good for union employment.

Posted in diet, professionalism | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

ILLUSTRATE illustrates the futility of measuring and treating blood “cholesterol”

Posted by Colin Rose on March 31, 2007

Intravascular ultrasound is a sensitive method for measuring the size of atherosclerotic plaques in the arterial wall. When testing a drug to see if it will have an effect on plaque volume, this technique is the gold standard.

ILLUSTRATE set out to show that adding torcetrapib, a drug that increases HDL, the “good” cholesterol, to Lipitor, that decreases, LDL, “bad” cholesterol would reverse plaque or at least stop its progression.

Here are the baseline characteristics of the subjects. Note that the average BMI was 30. Overweight is defined as a BMI over 25 and obesity over 30. So, all of them were overweight or obese. 20% were diabetic, most likely Type 2, related to obesity, and 75% were hypertensive. 18% smoked. All of those factors are risk factors for atherosclerosis related to lifestyle. Therefore, unless one intends to first completely eliminate these lifestyle risk factors, it was unethical to even conceive such a trial particularly since it is proven that atherosclerosis can be reversed by lifestyle change alone. The trialists probably rationalized that atherosclerosis, like pneumonia, must be treatable by drugs and Pfizer, who funded the trial, has a slogan, “Working for a Healthier World” it is ethical to do such a trial. Besides the money helps to keep one’s IVUS lab going and one is promoting the notion that the technique will some day lead to the cure for atherosclerosis.

 

Legal Addictions

The typical ILLUSTRATE patient

Here are the reported results. What was not mentioned in the abstract above is that plaque actually INCREASED in both the the Lipitor only group and the Lipitor plus torcetrapib group. Now, before actually starting the trial, the subjects were given enough Lipitor to adhere to the guidelines written by doctors paid by Pfizer and other statin dealers. So, following the guidelines for blood cholesterol lowering with Lipitor does not slow progression of plaque. The obsession with blood cholesterol is completely futile.

nejm-illustrate-result.jpg

The conclusions of the authors shows their blinkered view of atherosclerosis. While Dr. Nissen donates his personal drug money to charity (how much is paid to run his IVUS lab, if any, is not stated), all the other authors have major financial connections to drug dealers. Revkin, Shear and Duggan are employees of Pfizer and own stock. Naturally this group would ignore non-drug methods for reversing atherosclerosis

We have known how to reverse the atherosclerotic process very easily since the revolutionary work of Dean Ornish the final report of which was published in 1998. No drugs are necessary, only a change in lifestyle which was not seriously attempted in this study. There is even no reference to Ornish’s work in the paper, a major oversight of the reviewers. So, why don’t the IVUS groups do a study of plaque volume after significant lifestyle change? Who would fund it? If Pfizer is really “Working for a Healthier World” and not just making a profit, Pfizer should be funding an IVUS lifestyle trial.

Posted in atherosclerosis, cholesterol, coronary artery disease, professionalism, statins | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 47 other followers