<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MS patients have normal intracranial pressure-Zamboni&#8217;s &#8220;CCSVI&#8221; does not exist, &#8220;liberation&#8221; is futile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicalmyths.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/ms-patients-have-normal-intracranial-pressure-zambonis-ccsvi-does-not-exist-liberation-is-futile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicalmyths.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/ms-patients-have-normal-intracranial-pressure-zambonis-ccsvi-does-not-exist-liberation-is-futile/</link>
	<description>immunize yourself against the pandemic of lifestyle diseases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: perwest</title>
		<link>http://medicalmyths.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/ms-patients-have-normal-intracranial-pressure-zambonis-ccsvi-does-not-exist-liberation-is-futile/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[perwest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalmyths.wordpress.com/?p=1472#comment-616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe this would be of some interest. I don&#039;t know but CVD and CCSVI maybe not that far from each other Colin. Valveproblems in venues contra blokaged arterias. I don&#039;t know. I&#039;m just a patient and a former testpet of the neurologes.

http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-15181.html

Which organ is capable of lowering the bloodpressure by downregulating the hearthbeat, and why is the neurologes using 4 years on just teorizing about the Zamboni-thesis, instead of doing the actual very safe PTA on some of their RRMS-patients, likely to be able to regenerate before it&#039;s to late?

Why does the neurologes deny to try to restore the bloodflow to the most important organ in the human body, when other doctors use pta to restore any other organs?

Why do dogs develope MS-plagues in their brain, when Homo Sapiens do not, if the venuesystem in their neck is obstructed?

The most obvius cause is to think, that Zamboni is not far from the truth, is the reaction from the neurologs, who didn&#039;t find it sensible to donate from the funding to Dr. Zivadinov who actual claimed that he had regisreated more obstructions in patients than in healty controls, and that the neuroloegs feels comfortable of having easy acces to persons that will allow them to make all kind of investigations.

In fact, originally this was the reason for the neurologs to open up for patientmembers when they founded the Danish Scleroseassosiation.

And then my feeling of relief from my own sympthoms, after recieving the Zambonitreatment, and why is it that doctors who gets the disease, them selves or their relatives, suddently find it very obvious to receive the treatment?

The key to the whole issue, still is, how much blood is flowing through the arterias in the neck of a healthy control, contra a sclerosepatient?

According to Prof. Per Soelberg Sørensen, Danish head of the MS-department in Denmark, the bloodflow is very restricted, compared to HC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this would be of some interest. I don&#8217;t know but CVD and CCSVI maybe not that far from each other Colin. Valveproblems in venues contra blokaged arterias. I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m just a patient and a former testpet of the neurologes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-15181.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thisisms.com/ftopict-15181.html</a></p>
<p>Which organ is capable of lowering the bloodpressure by downregulating the hearthbeat, and why is the neurologes using 4 years on just teorizing about the Zamboni-thesis, instead of doing the actual very safe PTA on some of their RRMS-patients, likely to be able to regenerate before it&#8217;s to late?</p>
<p>Why does the neurologes deny to try to restore the bloodflow to the most important organ in the human body, when other doctors use pta to restore any other organs?</p>
<p>Why do dogs develope MS-plagues in their brain, when Homo Sapiens do not, if the venuesystem in their neck is obstructed?</p>
<p>The most obvius cause is to think, that Zamboni is not far from the truth, is the reaction from the neurologs, who didn&#8217;t find it sensible to donate from the funding to Dr. Zivadinov who actual claimed that he had regisreated more obstructions in patients than in healty controls, and that the neuroloegs feels comfortable of having easy acces to persons that will allow them to make all kind of investigations.</p>
<p>In fact, originally this was the reason for the neurologs to open up for patientmembers when they founded the Danish Scleroseassosiation.</p>
<p>And then my feeling of relief from my own sympthoms, after recieving the Zambonitreatment, and why is it that doctors who gets the disease, them selves or their relatives, suddently find it very obvious to receive the treatment?</p>
<p>The key to the whole issue, still is, how much blood is flowing through the arterias in the neck of a healthy control, contra a sclerosepatient?</p>
<p>According to Prof. Per Soelberg Sørensen, Danish head of the MS-department in Denmark, the bloodflow is very restricted, compared to HC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
